jmicheal2333 wrote:cwilson wrote:jmicheal2333 wrote:Ideas for seeding at state
state coaches have meeting before tournament to discuss seeding
criteria: top 2 placers at regionals go on board
in no particular order
1.overall winning percentage
2. last years state placement-State champ at same weight, state champ different weight, state placer
3. head to head
*if there was an upset at regionals then coaches can decide together to put wrestler on board based on there criteria.
This avoids most match ups to early in the tournament but will not avoid them all.
That will never happen. THe state is too big to get everybody together for a seeding meeting. The UIL likes to get brackets done so they can make programs, etc. A seeding meeting gets to close to the state tournament date and causes logistical problems. THis is why you see a matrix in almost every state. Are there any states that have a seeding meeting for state? IMO, If the state tournament is seeded, it should be by a point system that is computer generated. YOu have to take bias out of a seeding meeting at the state tournament.
If making a program for the fans is the most important to UIL or coaches then they shouldn't change a thing... “If you always do what you've always done, you'll always get what you've always got.”
Like I said, if you are going to seed it, it should be computer generated. Kids should not be seeded based on what somebody thinks. It needs to be a mathematical model free from biased, or just simply separate the regional champs if there is two or more previous placers amongst the regional champs. coaches vote should not be a seeding criteria at the state tournament, and if a bunch of coaches get together, that is exactly what will happen. You will see alliances form, and that is not where we want to go.
Simple separaton of regional champs or a computer generated seeding system still gets the programs printed! That means the UIL is happy, because if the UIL isn't happy, it won't happen.